Sort of trivial, but[]
Is it just me or are the explanations for each ability shown in the screenshots kind of poorly written and/or dumbed down? I'm wondering if we even ought to use them at all, as we have been. They certainly don't meet wiki standards anyway, with the use of pronouns and poor punctuation and such. 
18:36, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
I think we should just keep the descriptions anyways. We can go in-depth after we finish quoting. AssassinLegend 19:28, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
I'm sort of torn. I feel like putting in a quality description afterward is sort of redundant, but I agree with you for the sake of documenting the actual game content. Maybe we can organize it differently, like just have the Wiki description first, followed by the in-game description afterward and in a separate sub-heading. I dunno. 19:35, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I'd prefer the in-game description first, just so that the reader can get a summary of what they're looking at, and then we can list strategies and more advanced stuff afterwards. But if you prefer having the Wiki description first, it's your call. AssassinLegend 19:37, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
The other issue I'm having is that it's tailored to what looks to be the XBOX, judging by the button-naming in the text. How do we deal with that, being that it isn't universal? 19:40, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
Right Bumper corresponds to R2 on the PS3. Not so sure for the PC, though, considering that PC controls are variable (and we don't even know what the PC controls are anyways). AssassinLegend 20:44, April 21, 2011 (UTC)